WalpulseWalpulse

Latin American Regulation

FATF/GAFILAT pushes Central and South American countries to regulate institutions that offer virtual-asset services. If you are one of those institutions, Walpulse can become an important ally — delivering verifiable signals that give you on-chain intelligence.

The FATF context

The FATF (Financial Action Task Force; GAFI in Spanish) sets the global AML standard. It publishes 40 Recommendations that do not become a treaty a country “signs and is done.” Each country must adhere politically and transpose them into local law and supervision. In this region the main vehicle is GAFILAT (18 members that adhere to the 40 Recommendations).

Among those 40, five recommendations focus specifically on virtual assets, and several countries have adopted them in local legislation applying to institutions that offer services linked to those assets.

Adherence ≠ implementation

Almost all of Central and South America accepts the 40 Recommendations via GAFILAT or CFATF. That is not the same as an operating crypto regime with licensing, supervision, and enforcement for virtual-asset service providers.

Recommendations that matter for crypto

The 40 cover risk, prevention, transparency, and supervision. For virtual assets the core is:

  • R.1 · Risk-based approach

    The country and obliged entities identify and mitigate ML/TF risks proportionally

  • R.10 · Customer due diligence (CDD / KYC)

    Identify the customer and beneficial owner; enhanced diligence if risk is high

  • R.15 · New technologies + virtual assets

    Specific VA / VASP standard: license or register, preventive measures, Travel Rule

  • R.16 · Wire transfers

    Basis of the Travel Rule: originator and beneficiary travel with VASP-to-VASP transfers

  • R.20 · Suspicious transaction reporting

    The institution reports to the local financial-intelligence unit

Rec.Short titleWhat it requires in crypto
R.1Risk-based approachThe country and obliged entities identify and mitigate ML/TF risks proportionally
R.10Customer due diligence (CDD / KYC)Identify the customer and beneficial owner; enhanced diligence if risk is high
R.15New technologies + virtual assetsSpecific VA / VASP standard: license or register, preventive measures, Travel Rule
R.16Wire transfersBasis of the Travel Rule: originator and beneficiary travel with VASP-to-VASP transfers
R.20Suspicious transaction reportingThe institution reports to the local financial-intelligence unit

How this fits Walpulse

Walpulse offers wallet analysis (Basic / Standard / Expert) with verifiable on-chain signals and a client-parametrizable Risk Engine. For an institution under a FATF framework, that supplies concrete evidence for the risk-based approach, source-of-funds analysis, and activity monitoring.

  • R.1 / R.15 risk-based approach

    Does Walpulse fulfill it?
    Support
    How it can help
    A–F grades, breakdown, client 0–100 Risk Engine
  • Source of funds

    Does Walpulse fulfill it?
    Strong
    How it can help
    Origins (categories, concentration, mixer/OFAC as signal, hops by tier)
  • Activity profile / ongoing monitoring

    Does Walpulse fulfill it?
    Good
    How it can help
    Activity + Multichain; wash / circular / bot-like / mixing as signal
FATF requirement on country / institutionDoes Walpulse fulfill it?How it can help
R.1 / R.15 risk-based approachSupportA–F grades, breakdown, client 0–100 Risk Engine
Source of fundsStrongOrigins (categories, concentration, mixer/OFAC as signal, hops by tier)
Activity profile / ongoing monitoringGoodActivity + Multichain; wash / circular / bot-like / mixing as signal
Walpulse signals strengthen the risk-based approach, source of funds, and ongoing monitoring that FATF / GAFILAT expect in your framework. We do not offer services related to VASP licensing, KYC, or Travel Rule.

Regional panorama (updated September 2026)

Hover (or tap on mobile) a country to see the 2026 crypto / AML regime.

Explore the map

Classification

  • Adhere to FATF and GAFILAT (with local legislation in force)
  • Adhere to FATF and GAFILAT (no local legislation in force, or still being created)
  • Adhere to GAFILAT only (with local legislation in force)
  • Adhere to GAFILAT only (no local legislation in force, or still being created)
  • Other regional adherence (e.g. CFATF) — not classified on this map
Regional panorama (updated September 2026)
  • MexicoAdheres to the 40 R.?: Yes (FATF + GAFILAT)Crypto / AML regime 2026: Fintech Law + LFPIORPI art. 17 XVI (virtual assets as vulnerable activity)Travel Rule: FATF self-report: yesNotes: R.15 LC (2021)
  • GuatemalaAdheres to the 40 R.?: Yes (GAFILAT)Crypto / AML regime 2026: Decree 15-2026: exchanges, custodians and virtual-asset service providers as obliged entities before IVETravel Rule: Under construction via 2026 AML lawNotes: FATF/GAFILAT evaluation pressure
  • HondurasAdheres to the 40 R.?: Yes (GAFILAT)Crypto / AML regime 2026: R.15 C in 2017 MER (pre-package)Travel Rule: Not confirmedNotes: No VASP regime comparable to SV/CR/GT in 2026 sources
  • El SalvadorAdheres to the 40 R.?: Yes (GAFILAT)Crypto / AML regime 2026: CNAD + Digital Asset Issuance LawTravel Rule: Vendors list it as in forceNotes: R.15 PC (Aug 2024)
  • NicaraguaAdheres to the 40 R.?: Yes (GAFILAT)Crypto / AML regime 2026: Reported license/registry measures (GAFILAT ESR 2025)Travel Rule: Vendors: in developmentNotes: Verify real-world status
  • Costa RicaAdheres to the 40 R.?: Yes (GAFILAT)Crypto / AML regime 2026: Law 10961 (Gazette 19 Jun 2026); SUGEF registry; expected ~19 Sep 2026Travel Rule: CONASSIF regulation pending (Sep 2026)Notes: R.15 NC (2023); recent normative jump
  • PanamaAdheres to the 40 R.?: Yes (GAFILAT)Crypto / AML regime 2026: R.15 C in 2018 MER (pre–VA package)Travel Rule: Not confirmed as liveNotes: Cited by GAFILAT as R.15 reference; verify current VASP regime
  • Dominican RepublicAdheres to the 40 R.?: Yes (GAFILAT; Caribbean)Crypto / AML regime 2026: R.15 C 2019 MER; crypto policy project 2026Travel Rule: Not confirmedNotes: Evaluation pressure, not a closed regime
  • ColombiaAdheres to the 40 R.?: Yes (GAFILAT)Crypto / AML regime 2026: AML via local financial-intelligence unit / obliged entities; no clear enabling VASP license as of Aug 2026Travel Rule: In developmentNotes: Signal demand exists even if the buyer is not always labeled a VASP
  • VenezuelaAdheres to the 40 R.?: CFATF (not GAFILAT)Crypto / AML regime 2026: FATF 2026 self-report: law/registry yesTravel Rule: Vendors list it; FATF row does not mark TRNotes: R.15 PC (2025); FATF grey list (Jun 2026)
  • EcuadorAdheres to the 40 R.?: Yes (GAFILAT)Crypto / AML regime 2026: R.15 PC (2023)Travel Rule: Not confirmedNotes:
  • PeruAdheres to the 40 R.?: Yes (GAFILAT)Crypto / AML regime 2026: SBS / financial-intelligence unit progress; R.15 C note in 2019 MERTravel Rule: Vendors list it as in forceNotes: 2019 C rating must be read carefully
  • BoliviaAdheres to the 40 R.?: Yes (GAFILAT)Crypto / AML regime 2026: Lifted ban in 2024; R.15 PC (2024)Travel Rule: NoNotes: FATF grey list (Jun 2026)
  • ParaguayAdheres to the 40 R.?: Yes (GAFILAT)Crypto / AML regime 2026: R.15 LC (2022)Travel Rule: Not confirmed as liveNotes: Crypto-services hub; uneven supervision
  • BrazilAdheres to the 40 R.?: Yes (FATF + GAFILAT)Crypto / AML regime 2026: BCB Resolutions 519/520/521 live since 2 Feb 2026; license for virtual-asset service providersTravel Rule: Scheduled 2 Feb 2027 (not live)Notes: Most mature market in the region; R.15 PC (2023)
  • UruguayAdheres to the 40 R.?: Yes (GAFILAT)Crypto / AML regime 2026: BCU Circular 2507 (Jul 2026); adaptation window to Jun 2027Travel Rule: Not shown as live Travel Rule in 2026 sources reviewedNotes: R.15 LC (MER 2020, before 2507)
  • ArgentinaAdheres to the 40 R.?: Yes (FATF + GAFILAT)Crypto / AML regime 2026: Law 27.739 + CNV registry for virtual-asset service providers (RG 1058/2025) + local financial-intelligence unitTravel Rule: Vendors mark it live; verify local thresholdNotes: Large market; R.15 PC (2024)
  • ChileAdheres to the 40 R.?: Yes (GAFILAT)Crypto / AML regime 2026: Fintech Law 21.521; CMF registry; FIU applies R.15Travel Rule: Vendors list it as in forceNotes: R.15 PC (2021); partial regime

FATF grey list (19 June 2026) in the region

Under increased monitoring in this geography: Bolivia, Venezuela, and Haiti (Caribbean). Grey list ≠ “does not accept FATF”: it is the opposite — the country committed to an action plan because the regime (in general, not only crypto) has strategic deficiencies.

Looking for an institutional ally for risk signals and monitoring under a FATF framework?