Basic
Analysis designed for high volumes, suggested for micropayment wallets or lower amounts.
It also works as a pre-filter: if signals warrant more depth, move to Standard or Expert.
We offer a virtual wallet analysis based on the depth our client needs: Basic, Standard, or Expert. Each depth delivers different levels of the signals.
Basic
Analysis designed for high volumes, suggested for micropayment wallets or lower amounts.
It also works as a pre-filter: if signals warrant more depth, move to Standard or Expert.
Coverage
Ecosystem Presence signal across ~15 networks (including: eth, polygon, bsc, avalanche, arbitrum, gnosis, base, optimism, among others).
Origin of Funds signal on the two networks with the most wallet activity; up to 100 inbound transfers by value (not chronological) on each. No additional hops.
Recent Activity signal for the last 15 days on those two networks.
OFAC compliance screen of the target wallet: on-chain exposure signal to known lists. Not official screening or a compliance determination.
Deliverables
SynchronousThe call returns immediately with the full package ready to consume in your flow.
Package
Integrity and verification
Chain![]()
Standard
A full analysis of all four signal parts, with risk screening on the main funders.
Recommended for everyday due diligence, onboarding, or amounts beyond a pre-filter.
Coverage
Ecosystem Presence signal across ~100 networks (including: eth, polygon, bsc, avalanche, arbitrum, gnosis, base, optimism, among others).
Portfolio Quality signal across 30–50 networks (including Solana), via Zerion.
Origin of Funds signal on the five networks with the most activity; up to 250 inbound transfers by value on each.
Risk screening (hop-1) on the two wallets that funded the analyzed wallet the most: one dominant chain per funder; OFAC, mixer, CEX, and bridge signals. Provenance context — not a second Origins run or official screening.
Recent Activity signal for the last 45 days on those five networks (no counterparty re-analysis).
OFAC compliance screen of the target wallet: on-chain exposure signal to known lists. Not official screening or a compliance determination.
Deliverables
AsynchronousRequested via API; when processing finishes you are notified by email with the analysis PDF, or you can view the result in the same dashboard.
Package
Integrity and verification
Chain![]()
Expert
Maximum published depth: more networks, deeper funder risk screening, and Activity light on top counterparties.
Built for investigations, high-value cases, or when funding and peer context matters.
Coverage
Ecosystem Presence signal across ~100 networks (including: eth, polygon, bsc, avalanche, arbitrum, gnosis, base, optimism, among others).
Portfolio Quality signal across 30–50 networks (including Solana), via Zerion.
Origin of Funds signal on the ten networks with the most activity; up to 500 inbound transfers by value on each.
Risk screening on the five wallets that funded the analyzed wallet the most (one dominant chain): hop-1 always; hop-2 only if the hop-1 funder is a normal wallet (not CEX, bridge, mixer, or OFAC). Provenance context — not a full Origins run or official screening.
Recent Activity signal for the last 90 days on those ten networks.
Activity light (embedded Basic analysis) on the five counterparties with the most interaction; no Portfolio or compliance screen for those wallets.
OFAC compliance screen of the target wallet: on-chain exposure signal to known lists. Not official screening or a compliance determination.
Deliverables
AsynchronousRequested via API; when processing finishes you are notified by email with the analysis PDF, or you can view the result in the same dashboard.
Package
Integrity and verification
Chain![]()
A signal apart from the four analysis parts: a probabilistic read of whether the analyzed wallet looks hosted (CEX / inferred deposit) or unhosted (apparent self-custody). Not a fifth SKU and not part of Portfolio.
Complements fund origins with a read of the subject wallet type. The recipient interprets; it is not proof of who controls the keys.
| Internal signal | Basic | Standard | Expert | How it informs the decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01Hosted / unhosted class and probability | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Classes such as known hosted, inferred deposit, likely unhosted, or unknown, with confidence percentages. An explainable signal, not a binary verdict. |
| 02Depth by tier | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Basic: CEX-catalog lookup of the subject. Standard and Expert: plus sweep toward CEX hot wallets and a residual behavioral score. |
| 03Distinct from funders’ inferred CEX deposits | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Custody is about the analyzed wallet. Inferred CEX deposits in Origins label who funded it, not the subject. |
Each part of the analysis is built from internal signals the recipient can read and audit. Coverage (networks, window, hops) scales with Basic, Standard, or Expert.
01 / 04
A map of which networks the wallet appears on, how continuous that presence is, and —in Standard/Expert— how intensely it operates across chains. Included in all three depths.
| Internal signal | Basic | Standard | Expert | How it informs the decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01Number of networks with activity | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | How many distinct blockchains show a footprint. More networks can mean diversified operations or a wider surface to review. |
| 02Multi-network activity age | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | How long on-chain traces exist across networks. Helps separate brand-new wallets from longer trajectories. |
| 03Recently active networks | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Which networks show movement in 30- and 90-day windows. Separates historical presence from current use. |
| 04Share of dormant networks | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | How much of the footprint is inactive. Avoids over-reading old networks with no recent activity. |
| 05Consistency across networks | — | ✓ | ✓ | Whether behavior is stably distributed across chains. In Basic it is not always available (presence footprint only). |
| 06Recency of latest activity | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | How recent the last relevant trace is. Indicates whether the wallet still looks active or abandoned. |
| 07Presence in core ecosystems | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Whether it operates on market-reference networks. Adds maturity and environment context. |
| 08Footprint concentration | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Whether multi-network history is spread out or dominated by a few chains. |
| 09Longevity per network | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Signals of lasting presence on specific chains versus pass-through behavior. |
| 10Cross-network intensity | — | ✓ | ✓ | In Standard and Expert: transaction intensity across chains and relative weight. Basic focuses on presence footprint. |
The analysis emphasizes signals, with auditable detail. The recipient should take the signals provided and apply their own decision model to decide whether to interact with the wallet. Even if the analysis includes some form of score, it is delivered for information only and must not be used as a decision source.